Rate My Dynasty Trade
Rate a dynasty trade without signup using format-aware asset values, a clear verdict, gap percentage, and balance suggestions.
Team A
Receives these assets
Add a player or rookie pick to start your side of the deal.
Team B
Receives these assets
Add a player or rookie pick to start your side of the deal.
Your next move, made clearer.
Add assets to both sides for an instant verdict.
Bring in your Sleeper leagueOPTIONAL
ON THIS DEVICE
Bring in your Sleeper league
Import a public league, select a roster, and add its players and future picks to either receiving package. League import never blocks the first calculation.
Read-only public roster import. No Sleeper password, account connection or trade submission.
Import a league, then save it to switch between your leagues here.
Sleeper API access is a personal-use preview; commercial use requires Sleeper licensing.
ON THIS DEVICE
Your local workspace
Save comparisons, keep a player watchlist and switch leagues on this browser. Nothing here requires an account.
Save a comparison above to return to it later.
Local limits: 30 saved trades, 100 history entries, 100 watched players and 10 leagues. Clearing browser storage removes these records. No cloud sync.
Download a backup before changing browsers. Exports may contain public league and roster names; share them only with people you choose.
Independent experimental values · 816 player assets · See the model and sources
Want a quick second opinion before accepting an offer? Enter what Team A and Team B receive, confirm the league settings, and use the verdict as a structured first pass. The calculator shows whether the model sees an even deal or an edge, how large the gap is, and one way to make the packages closer. A strong rating does not automatically make a trade right for your roster. Check your competitive window, starting spots, injury exposure, and the flexibility you give up when moving future picks.
A rating is a prompt for better questions
Ask why the model prefers a package. Is it quarterback scarcity, premium scoring, draft capital, or a consolidation adjustment? If the answer depends on a setting your league does not use, the rating needs to be recalculated.
Example: review an offer before accepting
Enter the proposed players and picks exactly as offered. Compare the gap before and after a mid second-round pick is added, then decide whether that addition is meaningful for both managers.
Questions before you trade?
What does Fleece mean here?
It is a label for a large gap within this model. It is not a claim that a manager acted unfairly or that a league should veto the trade.
Can an uneven trade still help both teams?
Yes. Different competitive windows, lineup needs, and risk preferences can make different packages useful.
Should a calculator result decide a veto?
No. A model disagreement is not evidence of collusion. Follow your league rules and examine conduct rather than a single numerical rating.